What Criteria are Used in Evaluating Alternatives?
When evaluating alternatives, several criteria must be considered to ensure the alternative's safety and efficacy. These criteria include:
Toxicity: Assessing the potential toxicity of the alternative is crucial. This involves examining acute and chronic effects, including carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, and reproductive toxicity. Environmental Impact: Evaluators must consider the alternative's impact on the environment, including its persistence, bioaccumulation, and potential for environmental degradation. Functional Performance: The alternative must perform its intended function effectively without compromising quality or safety. Economic Feasibility: The cost of implementation and potential economic benefits must be considered to ensure the alternative is viable for industry adoption. Regulatory Compliance: Alternatives must comply with existing regulations and standards to ensure legal use.
